In my series “What is race? (and why we can’t agree about it)” I have argued that the races ought to be classified as separate species. I argued this in part, on the fact that our brains think of them as being in the same classification level. Going through my research archives for another project …
Sticking with those who look like you--those of your own race--is the best way not only respect your own race and racial needs, but also other races and their racial needs.
Nick Fuentes pulls a Sargon, and makes other mistakes. Let's do a little fact and logic checking on Nick.
When it comes to social preferences, which has more weight: Race or Values? And does this matter for the prospect of creating a racially defined "ethnostate"?
To the anti-White establishment no such person as a White victim is allowed to exist.
The common accusation that those who focus on identities like race are simply losers without individual achievements to celebrate is wrong: in fact, people who celebrate collective identities value different, and arguably better, things, than individualists.
If there is one thing the left has mastered it is hypocrisy. They have literally gotten so good at it that I swear many of them seem oblivious to the fact that they are doing it: hypocrisy is second nature to the left. Examples abound. Here is another such gem: A Black gay huffpost writer …
People who form emotional romantic attachments to people of a different race than themselves can never give their own race there own race the loyalty they owe them. People with such emotional entanglements are committing emotional treason.