In my series “What is race? (and why we can’t agree about it)” I have argued that the races ought to be classified as separate species. I argued this in part, on the fact that our brains think of them as being in the same classification level. Going through my research archives for another project …
Sticking with those who look like you--those of your own race--is the best way not only respect your own race and racial needs, but also other races and their racial needs.
Nick Fuentes pulls a Sargon, and makes other mistakes. Let's do a little fact and logic checking on Nick.
When it comes to social preferences, which has more weight: Race or Values? And does this matter for the prospect of creating a racially defined "ethnostate"?
To the anti-White establishment no such person as a White victim is allowed to exist.
The common accusation that those who focus on identities like race are simply losers without individual achievements to celebrate is wrong: in fact, people who celebrate collective identities value different, and arguably better, things, than individualists.
The Cato Institute free speech survey finds exactly what us on the right knew they would: majority of "strong liberals" support political violence and only a narrow majority of Democrats oppose it.
We can't let "traditionalism" divide us. White men and women must come together, and join forces to fight the battles of our people. White identity is and must be our only defining focus.
The independent report on the Unite the Right rally shows that upwards of 70% of the violence had known leftist instigation.
The Difference between the alt-right and the alt-light on similarity with the left is a matter of ends v means. The Alt-right differs from the left on ends, while the alt-light differs only in means. The ideal world of the left and the alt-light are the same, whiles on the alt-right, ours is very different.